<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zodiac Killer Facts</title>
	<link>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog</link>
	<description>Zodiac Researcher Michael Butterfield's ideas on the facts of the Zodiac Killer</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Memory Of Paul Stine: No Justice For The Dead by Matt</title>
		<link>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/in-memory-of-paul-stine-no-justice-for-the-dead/#comment-18</link>
		<author>Matt</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/in-memory-of-paul-stine-no-justice-for-the-dead/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>A moving tribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A moving tribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to ZodiacKillerFacts.com by John King</title>
		<link>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/welcome-to-zodiackillerfactscom/#comment-14</link>
		<author>John King</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/welcome-to-zodiackillerfactscom/#comment-14</guid>
					<description>I watched the History show last night and I have to agree with everything you said about it.  I was certainly not expecting a solution to the mystery but I was a little disappointed that so much time was spent trying to lend authenticity to a theory which even someone with no prior knowledge of the case would clearly see was a stretch, to put it politely. 

Still, I am always pleased to see new material on the Zodiac. You never know when something will inspire a new person into being interested in the case-  a person who may someday make just the right contribution to unlock the mysterious secrets of this tragic piece of our modern history. 

I myself was dragged unwillingly into the world of the Zodiac by a college friend who was an enthusiastic follower of the case.  I remember sitting with him in his room as he related countless stories, facts and theories, night after night; showing me charts, maps, photos, drawings- it seemed like he had all the information there was.   I remember being horrified, disgusted and yet fascinated by what he was telling me.  Ever since that time I have hungrily devoured every new scrap of information about the Zodiac.  I wouldn't call myself an expert, although I certainly know more about this case than the average person.  Neither can I say I have made any sort of contribution to the case, but if my "moral" support for that college friend- who is now a recognized expert on the Zodiac case- did anything to encourage him in his endeavors, then that is enough for me.  I have lost touch with him over the last few years, but I know he is out there tracking down clues.  

Thanks for the website.  It's rational, which is the highest complement I can pay it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the History show last night and I have to agree with everything you said about it.  I was certainly not expecting a solution to the mystery but I was a little disappointed that so much time was spent trying to lend authenticity to a theory which even someone with no prior knowledge of the case would clearly see was a stretch, to put it politely. </p>
<p>Still, I am always pleased to see new material on the Zodiac. You never know when something will inspire a new person into being interested in the case-  a person who may someday make just the right contribution to unlock the mysterious secrets of this tragic piece of our modern history. </p>
<p>I myself was dragged unwillingly into the world of the Zodiac by a college friend who was an enthusiastic follower of the case.  I remember sitting with him in his room as he related countless stories, facts and theories, night after night; showing me charts, maps, photos, drawings- it seemed like he had all the information there was.   I remember being horrified, disgusted and yet fascinated by what he was telling me.  Ever since that time I have hungrily devoured every new scrap of information about the Zodiac.  I wouldn&#8217;t call myself an expert, although I certainly know more about this case than the average person.  Neither can I say I have made any sort of contribution to the case, but if my &#8220;moral&#8221; support for that college friend- who is now a recognized expert on the Zodiac case- did anything to encourage him in his endeavors, then that is enough for me.  I have lost touch with him over the last few years, but I know he is out there tracking down clues.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the website.  It&#8217;s rational, which is the highest complement I can pay it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to ZodiacKillerFacts.com by Mike</title>
		<link>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/welcome-to-zodiackillerfactscom/#comment-13</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zodiackillerfacts.com/blog/archives/welcome-to-zodiackillerfactscom/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>"As the Zodiac mystery turns forty years old, the public face of the case has become the face of a crackpot."

This is indeed true, a sad fact that hampers any serious investigators of any aspects of this unusual and compelling case.  

I've spent the last two years writing and researching a lengthy feature story about the decades-long Gareth Penn/Michael O'Hare saga.
The two subjects themselves are easily the most difficult people I've ever interviewed as a professional science journalist.  

All the crack-pottery and buffoonery surrounding the Zodiac case has made this difficult task all the more trying.  

Good luck on your efforts to turn the dialogue around.  

-- Mike Martin
http://www.weeklyscientist.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As the Zodiac mystery turns forty years old, the public face of the case has become the face of a crackpot.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is indeed true, a sad fact that hampers any serious investigators of any aspects of this unusual and compelling case.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent the last two years writing and researching a lengthy feature story about the decades-long Gareth Penn/Michael O&#8217;Hare saga.<br />
The two subjects themselves are easily the most difficult people I&#8217;ve ever interviewed as a professional science journalist.  </p>
<p>All the crack-pottery and buffoonery surrounding the Zodiac case has made this difficult task all the more trying.  </p>
<p>Good luck on your efforts to turn the dialogue around.  </p>
<p>&#8211; Mike Martin<br />
<a href="http://www.weeklyscientist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.weeklyscientist.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
