[To read an expanded and illustrated version of this review, follow this link to the Zodiackillerfacts.com message board–> http://www.zodiackillerfacts.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=92&t=633Â ]
During a recent trip to my old haunts in Manhattan, I decided to pay a visit to every New York bibliophileâ€™s second home, the famous Strand bookstore. Like most book lovers, I have a long list of rare and hard-to-find books in my head and I enjoy searching through the inventory of used book stores in the hopes of finding some of my long-sought items. As anyone who has been to The Strand can attest, the towering shelves and endless collection of book spines can be intoxicating and addictive, and youâ€™re always sure to find at least one gem. Yet, some people are just looking for some shiny “new” decoration for their bookshelf and they can always find something to fill the void.
Downstairs, I entered the narrow and densely-packed shelves of the true crime section and immediately noticed a bottom shelf lined with bright, yellow books, the spines featured a red crossed-circle and the title Most Evil. I was very familiar with the workings of used book stores, so I knew that the books were either unused, discounted remainders or used books discarded by the original purchaser/reader. My experience told me that it was unusual to see so many copies of what appeared to be new books, so I also knew that Most Evil had disappointed many people on several levels. I have been reluctant to encourage the authorâ€™s ongoing acts of exploitation so I had resisted paying the full price of $26.95 for this book online, however, The Strand was offering Most Evil for $13.95, so I bought a copy.
I skimmed through the book over the next few days, but on the long plane ride home I sat down with a legal pad, prepared to tackle the book in its entirety. Two hours into the flight, I had finished the book and had also filled pages of the pad with notes on the many factual errors and dubious claims by author Steve Hodel. Unfortunately, I had to read the book several more times, and I feel qualified to state that, even at $13.95, Most Evil was still a rip-off.
Hodel became a minor true crime celebrity due to his claims that he had solved the infamous “Black Dahlia” murder. Hodel accused his own father, the now-deceased Dr. George Hill Hodel, once named as a suspect in the 1947 “Dahlia” killing. According to Hodelâ€™s account, he began his journey of suspicion shortly after his fatherâ€™s death, when he discovered two photographs among his fatherâ€™s possessions. The images depicted a young, dark-haired woman and Hodel concluded that the woman was actually “The Black Dahlia” murder victim Elizabeth Short. A retired LAPD detective, Hodel began his own investigation and eventually claimed that his father was responsible for dozens of unsolved murders in the Los Angeles area and beyond as one of the most sadistic, demented and prolific serial killers in American history.
Hodelâ€™s book Black Dahlia Avenger was a best-seller and the author made the rounds on various TV documentary shows. Rumors of a subsequent movie deal died after the release of director Brian DePalmaâ€™s lavish Hollywood version of the notorious crime story. Los Angeles District Attorney Stephen Kay embraced Hodelâ€™s theory, declaring that the case was “closed.” James Elroy, author of the book which served as the basis for DePalmaâ€™s movie, endorsed Hodelâ€™s conclusions. The Los Angeles police department dismissed Hodelâ€™s claims, as did the majority of the experts, researchers and crime buffs devoted to the Dahlia mystery. Hortensia Stark, an ex-wife of George Hodelâ€™s, adamantly refuted Steve Hodelâ€™s accusations. “I strongly deny any indication that Dr. Hodel was a sadomasochist.” Stark described Steve Hodel as “A writer of pure fiction.” Dorothy, Hodelâ€™s wife at the time of the Dahlia murder investigation, told authorities, “All I know is that he is not the sort of man psychologically to be the kind to do it. He has a fine record as a doctor and is a dedicated man… but it is incredible to me that he should be in any way connected with it.”
Steve Hodelâ€™s entire theory was based on these and other “facts.”
* George Hodel had pictures of Dahlia victim Elizabeth Short among his possessions.
* George Hodel was named as a Dahlia suspect.
* George Hodel made incriminating statements.
* A photograph in Shortâ€™s possessions may have been George Hodel and may have been the man seen with Short prior to her death.
* A handwriting expert had linked Hodel to notes attributed to the so-called “Black Dahlia Avenger.”
TV producers hired experts who concluded that Elizabeth Short was not the woman in Hodelâ€™s photographs. Even a cursory comparison of Shortâ€™s many photographs with those presented by Steve Hodel proves that Short is not the woman in Hodelâ€™s pictures. Members of Shortâ€™s family also dismissed Hodelâ€™s claims, stating that the woman in his photographs was not Elizabeth Short. Ignoring the conclusions of the experts and Shortâ€™s own family, Hodelâ€™s subsequent editions of Black Dahlia Avenger featured more strained attempts to link Short to the photographs. Hodel admitted that the woman in the first photograph is not Short but he still believed that she is the woman in the second photograph. Today, Hodel says that the issue is “moot” because one official stated that George Hodel had been seen with Elizabeth Short.
Documents examiners questioned and contradicted the conclusions of Hodelâ€™s handwriting expert. The official transcript of George Hodelâ€™s statements indicates that his remarks were not as incriminating as his son suggests. The official documents also state that the transcripts and other evidence “tend to eliminate this suspect.” Hodel insists that his fatherâ€™s statements indicate his guilt.
As other aspects of the George Hodel theory also collapsed under scrutiny, Steve Hodel remained undeterred and continued with his quest to convict his father in the court of public opinion. James Elroy retracted his endorsement of Hodelâ€™s theory, explaining that he was wrong. Hodel dismissed Elroyâ€™s withdrawal as a conflict of interest because the feature film version of Elroyâ€™s Dahlia novel offered a different conclusion than Hodelâ€™s. Like the unsolved Zodiac case, the Black Dahlia mystery has its own cottage industries, personalities and theories/factions. In Dahlia circles, Hodelâ€™s theory remains a controversial chapter in the history of that case. On his website, Steve Hodel dismisses other critics and criticism as negative or derogatory attacks unworthy of comment.
Perhaps George Hodel did know Elizabeth Shortâ€“ to date, I have yet to see Steve Hodel present any credible evidence to implicate his father in her murder. However, his attempts to link his dead father to the Zodiac crimes will be forever remembered as one of the greatest acts of fraud in the history of nonfiction.
Most Evil is, by any definition, a true crime. As a reader, I often wondered if Steve Hodel was just pulling my leg for a buck. Hodel now claims that his father committed some of the most notorious murders in the annals of crime. In the introduction, Hodel wrote, “I know now that my father was also responsible for a series of infamous murders in Chicago (where he was known as the Lipstick Killer), Manilla (where the local press dubbed him the Jigsaw Murderer), and the Bay Area of California (where he called himself Zodiac).” Based on his previous track record, most readers would be forced to view this statement with skepticism; others might need a moment to collect themselves as they struggle to suppress the growing and probably-by-now uncontrollable fits of laughter welling up, ready to explode.
As I read through the book, I was astounded by the many unsubstantiated claims and leaps in logic, based on little more than speculation and rampant generalizations. Like Robert Graysmith, Howard Davis, Gareth Penn and so many others, Steve Hodelâ€™s theory seems compelling as long as you are not aware of the true facts. A complete assessment of Most Evil would take up more space and time than I care to commit here, but I will offer the following examination.
Steve Hodel cites the opinions of documents examiner Hannah MacFarland in order to link his father with the Lipstick and Zodiac crimes. MacFarland was also the same expert who had determined that George Hodel was the author of various Dahlia-related notes, despite the fact that there was no evidence linking these notes to the Dahlia killer. Other experts had contradicted MacFarlandâ€™s conclusions.
In his book, Hodel repeatedly misquotes the Zodiacâ€™s words, placing a hyphen where the Zodiac had clearly written a small letter “r” [as in “Lake He-Man“] and his transcriptions of various letters or writings are frequently incorrect. Such errors can be found throughout the book [pg. 124, pg. 142, and more]. Hodelâ€™s theory also relies on a letter of dubious origins which appeared in a newspaper article [see pg. 243]. The book also contains many factual inaccuracies regarding the Zodiac crimes and errors which are often baffling. On page 211, Hodel writes, “Land Art, also known as Earthworks, is a movement said to have been launched in October 1968 with the group exhibition â€˜Earthworksâ€™ at the Dwan Gallery in New York. Zodiacâ€™s first Bay Area murder occurred just one month later, in December 1968.” Anyone with basic math skills will immediately notice the glaring error in Hodelâ€™s calculations; readers who completed the book will recognize this seemingly simplistic error as foreshadowing of things to come.
George Hodel was sixty-two years old at the time of the Zodiacâ€™s last known murder, and even the oldest estimate of the suspectâ€™s age ranged somewhere between 35-45 years old. The witnesses who observed the killer on the night of October 11, 1969, in San Francisco, provided a description which cannot match Hodel by any stretch of the imagination. Throughout most of his life, George Hodel was seen wearing a dark moustache; none of the witnesses stated that the killer wore a moustache. Steve Hodel speculates that his father may have shaved off the moustache at various times but there is no evidence that he did so at this time, or that he regressed in age by two decades.
Steve Hodel also presents a sketch which he claims may be an official composite produced by “law enforcement.” The sketch first appeared on the cover of the book Great Crimes of San Francisco, which featured a chapter on the Zodiac case written by former Chronicle reporter Duffy Jennings. Hodel cites a “confidential source” who told him that Jennings stated that this sketch was produced by law enforcement. As one who has spent years conducting research on this case, I had to wonder why anyone would need to rely on a “confidential source” just to ask a reporter a rather simple question regarding the origins of a police sketch. Most people would simply note that the sketch reads “San Francisco Police Department” and then contact that department in search of information. However, Hodel relies on third-person information from a reporter via a confidential, unnamed person instead of going straight to the source. I believe he did so because he is not interested in the truth but rather in exploiting this sketch for all its potential to his cause.
The sketch in question depicts an elderly man wearing glasses and is accompanied by another sketch showing the killer in his hooded costume. The sketch was never issued to the public and has never been included or mentioned in any official documents over the last 40 years. In short, there is absolutely no reason to believe that this was a legitimate or official sketch yet Hodel wants us to believe as much. The sketch in question bears the date of October 18, 1969, the same date of the SFPD sketch which was released to the public. Common sense dictates that the SFPD would not create such a sketch, let alone one bearing the same exact date as the previously released official sketch.
In the 1990s, I worked as a production artist at DC Comics. To me, the sketch in question was clearly the work of a professional artistâ€“ in fact, the style and strokes seemed very familiar. One skeptical and studious â€œDahliaphileâ€ also recognized the artistâ€™s style and determined that the sketch appeared to be the work of famous illustrator Neal Adams. This person then contacted the artist and quickly received a response: Adams confirmed that he had produced the sketch for the cover of the book, Great Crimes of San Francisco. The sketch was not an official production and the face of the elderly man had absolutely nothing to do with the actual Zodiac case or the suspect at the Stine scene in October 1969. Most astute observers would have realized as much simply by looking at the drawing and utilizing common sense. [To read more about this sketch, follow this link to the message board posts by member “briar”: http://www.zodiackillerfacts.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=23&start=20 ]
On page 109, Hodel wrote, “The evidence linking my father, Dr. George Hodel, to the Zodiac murders in the San Francisco area in the summer and fall of 1969 is exceptionally strong and compelling.” Readers will note that Steve Hodelâ€™s book fails to provide any such evidence and instead offers only speculation, assumptions and tenuous “links” to support this theory. In fact, the only “evidence” presented by Hodel consists of the questionable conclusions of his handwriting expert.
Hodel links his father to the Zodiac with his contention that the gravesite of Elizabeth Short falls on the “radian” as claimed by another theorist, Gareth Penn. On page 214, Hodel wrote, “Elizabeth Shortâ€™s final resting place in Oaklandâ€™s Mountain View Cemetery is precisely intersected by Zodiacâ€™s lower radian (seen in Figure 18.7)â€“ the same one that extends through the Paul Stine crime scene. Could it be a coincidence that Elizabeth Short happened to be buried along the radian line purposely established by Zodiac when he directed Paul Stine to his specific place of execution? The mathematical probability of it being coincidence is infinitesimal. The Zodiac murders and the murder of Elizabeth Short must have been connected.”
Hodelâ€™s claim seems compelling if you do not know the real facts, and his book proves that he spent little time searching for the facts regarding his new “radian” theory. Gareth Penn claimed that two Zodiac crime scenesâ€“ the scene of the cabdriver murder in San Francisco and scene at Blue Rock Springs Parkâ€“ formed one radian, an angle measured at approximately 57.3 degrees, or between 57 and 58 degrees. In fact, the scenes form an angle measured at approximately 60 degrees or more. Hodel based his most “compelling evidence” on an already-discredited theory. [To read more about Gareth Penn’s radian theory, follow this link to the main site: http://www.zodiackillerfacts.com/radian.htm ]
On page 211, Hodel accurately describes the value of a radian as 57 degrees, 17 minutes and 44 seconds. Hodel then uses an apostrophe-like symbol to denote degrees when the correct symbol actually resembles a small circle. Hodelâ€™s later illustrations read, “58-59â€™ – radian,” as if the author does not even understand the concept of a radian or had somehow forgotten his previous and correct description of the angle.
Hodel offers several illustrations to prove his Zodiac/Short radian theory, yet, in each illustration, Hodelâ€™s placement of the relevant locations is clearly incorrect. On page 212, Hodel presents a copy of the Zodiacâ€™s Mt. Diablo map: his placement of the Stine scene in San Francisco is far South of the correct location, and his placement of the Blue Rock Springs Park scene is far Southwest, nowhere near the correct location. The caption on this map reads, “59′ = 1 radian” despite the fact that a radian is valued at 57.3 degrees. Even more baffling is the fact that the actual angle formed on Hodelâ€™s illustration is approximately 50 degreesâ€“ Hodelâ€™s illustration does not form a radian and does not even match his own stated value of the angle.
The same lack of research and factual accuracy is displayed in Hodelâ€™s second illustration, an aerial photograph on page 215. Again, Hodelâ€™s stated value of a radian is incorrect, and his caption reads, “58-59′ – radian.” Once again, Hodelâ€™s placement of the relevant scenes is incorrect, and his placement of these locations does not even match his previous illustration. On the aerial photograph, Hodel places the Blue Rock Springs Park crime scene far West of the correct location, directly above the gravesite of Elizabeth Short. However, the actual location does not align with the gravesite in this fashion, and Hodelâ€™s placement of this location does not match his previous illustration, either. Again, Hodelâ€™s stated measurement of his angle does not match the value of the angle shown. In this illustration, Hodelâ€™s angle measures at approximately 54 degrees, far short of a radian and nowhere near the “58-59” degrees Hodel claims in his caption.
The same flaws and errors appear in Hodelâ€™s third illustration on page 248. Here, Hodel presents another map, and, again, his placement of the relevant scenes is incredibly inaccurate. Hodel places a copy of the Zodiacâ€™s November 9 crossed-circle over Mt. Diablo, but he did not place the center of the crossed-circle on the peak of Mt. Diabloâ€“ in fact, the center of this crossed-circle is clearly not aligned with the peak or Hodelâ€™s lines on the map which are drawn to the peak itself.
Again, Hodelâ€™s placement of the relevant scenes is inaccurate. He places the Blue Rock Springs Park site far Westâ€“ again, nowhere near the correct location. Hodelâ€™s placement of this scene does not match his previous illustrations, and his placements of the Short gravesite and the Stine scenes are also incorrect.
In this illustration, Hodel presents another angle from his placement of the Blue Rock Springs Park scene to his version of Magnetic North. Hodelâ€™s caption for this second angle reads, “58-59′ radian.” Once again, the author misstates the value of the radian, once again using the incorrect symbol to denote degrees. This value of this angle is nowhere near a radian and does not even match Hodelâ€™s caption of “58-59” degrees. In fact, this angle is measured at approximately 75-76 degrees, far greater than a radian or Hodelâ€™s stated value.
In the same illustration, Hodel presents the other radian, allegedly formed by his placement of the two scenes, BRSP in Vallejo and the Stine scene in San Francisco. Again, Hodelâ€™s caption reads, “58-59” radian. Again, this angle is nowhere near a radian value and does not even match Hodelâ€™s captionâ€“ this angle measures at approximately 53 degrees.
A straight line drawn from the peak of Mt. Diablo to the scene of the Stine murder in San Francisco does not pass through Mountain View Cemetery or anywhere near the grave of Elizabeth Short. Hodel wrote, “The mathematical probability of it being coincidence is infinitesimal. The Zodiac murders and the murder of Elizabeth Short must have been connected.” Hodelâ€™s entire premise is false and, therefore, his claim that the Zodiac and Dahlia crimes “must have been connected” has no merit and is not based on fact.
Are we to believe that Steve Hodel didnâ€™t know that his book was so inaccurate in so many ways, that his own theories were so wrong on so many levels, that his own illustrations and measurements donâ€™t match his own notations and claims? The notion is most unsettling.
This review will most likely be met by some with cries that I have been unfair to Mr. Hodel, or that he is just trying to find the truth. Other apologists will claim that I am just being “negative” and not contributing anything of value to this case by constantly tearing down the work of others. And, someone who is unwilling to face the truth about Steve Hodel will undoubtedly offer a litany of excuses to explain-away his many errors, mistakes, and false claims. However, I believe that the facts speak for themselves: Steve Hodel has not presented any credible evidence to implicate his father in ANY murder, let alone the Zodiac crimes. Even if Hodel is somehow correct that his father knew Elizabeth Short he has not even come close to proving that George Hodel killed Short. Even if Steve Hodel manages to prove that George Hodel did kill Short, he has not presented any legitimate reason or evidence to justify the claim that his father is a viable suspect, let alone the Zodiac killer. His presentations regarding the Zodiac case in the book Most Evil cannot be used to connect George Hodel to that unsolved mystery.
Steve Hodel claims that his father had murdered several victims in Chicago and that Short had traveled there to investigate his possible involvement. Hodel also claims that his father killed Short because she may have been ready to expose him as the killer in the famous dismemberment and murder of a little girl “She died because of what sheâ€™d learned about my fatherâ€™s savage activities in Chicago,” Hodel wrote in Most Evil. According to Steve Hodel, his father killed Short and then severed her body in two partsâ€“ thereby drawing attention to the similarities to the Chicago dismemberment murderâ€“ and then displayed her mutilated corpse on a city streetâ€“ thereby making the crime a sensational and very public story that was bound to generate intense scrutiny and investigation, drawing attention to himself as well as the connection between the Short and Chicago murders, or, far more importantly, suggesting that Short had been killed by someone with links to both Los Angeles and Chicago. Yet, according to Steve Hodel, his father did all of this after he had been seen with Short in public, not only in Los Angeles but in Chicago as well. Had Short simply disappeared, the crime would have gone virtually unnoticed, there would be no “Dahlia” frenzy, no investigation, no Grand Jury probe, no wiretaps, no problem at all.
Steve Hodel also claims that his father had to use bribery to escape a morals charge for allegedly molesting his daughter yet he was given a virtual free pass, complete with a massive conspiracy Hodel calls “Dahliagate,” in order to escape justice for the Short killing and other crimes. According to Steve Hodel, his fatherâ€™s arrest would result in the revelations which could destroy the careers and reputations of many high officials in Los Angeles and his involvement in the Dahlia and other murders was concealed and basically ignored because these people feared exposure. “They had identified George Hodel as the suspect… They had him dead bang,” Hodel claimed, “They knew if they arrested George Hodel and charged him with the crimes, that it would expose internal corruption in the LAPD, not on some low level, not some corrupt cop stealing an apple, but on the highest levels.”
In this theory, Hodelâ€™s power could not save him from the morals charge and he was forced to buy his freedom to escape that minor conviction yet his guilt in the Dahlia killing was covered up by officials free of charge. These authorities preferred the embarrassment that resulted in their failure to solve the most shocking crime in recent history and decided it was better to let George Hodel run amok for decades, claiming more lives, free to expose them at the drop of a hat while they risked their own careers to make sure the case remained unsolved and Hodel escaped justice. Theorists who have been discredited, debunked and dismissed are always quick to cry conspiracy with claims that authorities are concealing the truth which would prove their theories, and Hodel is right on schedule.
If I had written Most Evil, I would be too ashamed to leave my house. On his website, stevehodel.com, Hodel reports that he will soon present a “Black Dahlia Power Point Talk” to the Century City Bar Association on May 26, 2010, in Los Angeles. The author provides booking information for the event at the Westside Tavern; those who are not members of the Bar must pay $40.00 to attend. Will Hodel begin the Power Point presentation with the compelling new evidence from his book Most Evil? Will he explain to the audience that none of his Zodiac illustrations are accurate and all of his claims are bogus? Will Hodel have the courage or integrity to correct his own work or retract his claims? If so, some in the audience might want a refund.
Most likely, Hodel will do what others have done in the past when confronted with their own reflectionâ€“ blame the messenger or cry foul. Perhaps Steve Hodel will claim that I have highlighted the flaws of Most Evil because I have written a book about the Zodiac case or maybe heâ€™ll follow in the footsteps of Dennis Kaufman and offer the ridiculous claim that Iâ€™m just one of those people who doesnâ€™t want to see this case solved because we would lose our livelihoods. Perhaps Hodel will blame his co-author and claim that he didnâ€™t know that so much of the material in Most Evil was inexcusably incorrect. Maybe Hodel will accuse some unnamed assistant who was responsible for the illustrations in his book, or point the finger at a lazy editor. Or maybe heâ€™ll claim that his own measurements and maps were accurate but somehow distorted in the printing process.
Perhaps Hodel will fall back on the standard line and reply that he was only speculating that his father was the Zodiac, that itâ€™s “just a theory,” or that he had only said his father “may” be involved in these crimes, asking us all to forget that he began his book with this claim: “I know now that my father was also responsible for a series of infamous murders in Chicago (where he was known as the Lipstick Killer), Manilla (where the local press dubbed him the Jigsaw Murderer), and the Bay Area of California (where he called himself Zodiac).” Given the evidence presented in Most Evil, Hodel has obviously failed to substantiate this claim by any stretch of the imagination.
In his last paragraphs of Most Evil, Hodel writes that he acts “in the interest of honoring the victims and their families.” I do not believe that Mr. Hodel cares about what is in the best interest of the victims, their loved ones, or this case. If he was occupied by such concerns, he would not be peddling this book in the first place, and he would issue a public apology to the victims, their families, his own family, the investigators, and the public. Then he would take a self-imposed life-long break from solving any mystery, including the case of his missing newspaper or misplaced remote control.
Perhaps a more fitting title for Hodelâ€™s book would be Most Vile. Or, maybe just Most Awful. Hmmâ€“ doesnâ€™t have that ring. Iâ€™ll work on it. Hang on.
In the meantime, thereâ€™s one thing Mr. Hodel could do for me personally â€“ refund my $13.95. After all, The Strand didnâ€™t know that this book was a collection of mule fritters, but he sure did.
[Note: Inevitably, someone will try to excuse Hodelâ€™s factual errors and inaccurate measurements by claiming he obtained his erroneous material from me or my site due to the fact that Hodel cites me and my site as a source in Most Evil. I have made a concerted effort to correct my own errors regarding Gareth Pennâ€™s radian theory, but, in all honesty, there is no way that anyone could take the material on my site and achieve Hodelâ€™s incorrect results.]